Militærmaktseminaret 2018: Ny verda – nytt NATO?
Korleis kan vi sikre eit truverdig kollektivt forsvar av Europa i desse Trump-tider? Forsvarsminister Frank Bakke-Jensen opnar det 20. Militærmaktseminaret der vi inviterer til politisk og fagleg debatt.
Balancing between integration and autonomy. Understanding the drivers and mechanisms of EU's foreign, security and defense policy (EUFLEX)
EUFLEX studerer både hvordan EU, medlemsstatene og assosierte stater, som Norge, balanserer mellom hensynet til å ivareta nasjonal selvbestemmelse (autonomi) på den ene siden, og lojalitet til selve E...
PODKAST: Skaper FN fred?
Ifølge Kari Osland er kjempeorganisasjonen fortsatt svært viktig for verden.
Etterretning og kontroll i ei verd av komplekse truslar
Ian Leigh og Njord Wegge lanserer ny bok om utfordringane etterretnings- og kontrollorgana står overfor i eit endra tryggingsmiljø.
Russia's strategic approaches to Europe: Addressing the puzzle through policy relevant research (StratApproach)
Hvordan er Russlands strategiske tilnærming til Europa formet av landets tolkning av vestlige intensjoner og handlinger? Og hvilke konsekvenser har denne tilnærmingen for Norge?...
Kinship diplomacy, or diplomats of a kin
Familiarity breeds contempt, or so the idiom goes, and historically there are ample examples of how family-ties and blood kinship have not fostered peaceful cooperation. By contrast, metaphorical kinship has been seen to grease the wheels of diplomacy, creating and sustaining ties between different polities and underpinning a shared diplomatic culture. While metaphorical kinship and family metaphors are certainly central to diplomacy, my main argument in this chapter is that blood kinship, has been underestimated as a cohesive factor in diplomatic interaction. At a general level, I argue that notions and practices of blood kinship, both in consanguine and affinal form, mattered to ‘modern’, Euro-centric and noble-dominated diplomacy from its emergence during the Renaissance to roughly speaking 1919. However, both notions and practices varied and were deployed in different ways at different times, reflecting differing configurations of knowledge and power. In the renaissance, kinship diplomacy could be understood as a leftover from earlier ways of organising social interaction. With consolidating policies in the early modern period, kinship diplomacy became particularly important for families and polities situated in border regions between larger polities. Finally, much of the diplomatic culture often associated with the ‘classical diplomacy’ of the 18th and 19th centuries, was based not only on notions of commonality, but on invoked blood kinship and marriages across boundaries.
KRONIKK: EØS gir oss vern i handelskrigen
Norge slipper unna EUs ståltoll. Det kan vi takke EØS-avtalen for, skriver Arne Melchior.
KRONIKK: Skjerpet lobbykamp
Etter brexit vil Storbritannia måtte påvirke EU fra utsiden. Norge får konkurranse.
Nordiske svar på geopolitiske utfordringer
Ukens analyse for DNAK er skrevet av seniorforsker Kristin Haugevik og forskningssjef Ole Jacob Sending, begge ved Norsk utenrikspolitisk institutt (NUPI). De skriver om hvordan de fem nordiske landene responderer på omveltningene i internasjonal politikk.
The family of nations. Kinship as an international ordering principle in the nineteenth century.
This chapter suggests that the phrase ‘the family of nations’ for a long time was more commonly deployed amongst international actors themselves to describe ‘the international’ than more common concepts in contemporary IR scholarship such as ‘international system’, ‘society’, and ‘community’. The authors argue that in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, the concept of a family of nations was integral to legitimizing strategies for coercive measures and colonial rule.