Plugging the capability-expectations gap: towards effective, comprehensive and conflict-sensitive EU crisis response?
Since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009, the European Union (EU) has spent considerable time and energy on defining and refining its comprehensive approach to external conflicts. The knock-on effects of new and protracted crises, from the war in Ukraine to the multi-faceted armed conflicts in the Sahel and the wider Middle East, have made the improvement of external crisis-response capacities a top priority. But has the EU managed to plug the capability–expectations gap, and develop an effective, comprehensive and conflict sensitive crisis-response capability? Drawing on institutional theory and an approach developed by March and Olsen, this article analyses whether the EU has the administrative capacities needed in order to be an effective actor in this area and implement a policy in line with the established goals and objectives identified in its comprehensive approach.
Europeiske land spriker i hvordan de snakker om kritiske forhold med Kina
Det viser en ny rapport som tar for seg politiske verdier i Europas forhold til Kina.
Slik svekkes forholdet mellom Europa og USA
EU blir mer uavhengig av USA. Samtidig er USAs utenrikspolitikk mindre Europa-orientert.
Kinesiske og nordiske prioriteringar inn mot 2030 berekraftsdagsordenen
Forskarar frå NUPI og CMI møtest i Bergen for å diskutere den pågåande forskinga si om kinesiske og nordiske bidrag inn mot berekraftsmåla og Agenda 2030. Erik Solheim, tidlegare leiar av FNs miljøprogram vil kommentere og dele frå erfaringane sine.
Ein stadig lausare union? Differensiering i europeisk integrasjon
Professor Frank Schimmelfennig kjem til NUPI for å diskutere differensiert integrasjon, som har blitt eit hovudtrekk ved europeisk integrasjon.
Kinesisk cybertryggleik og konsekvensar for Europa
Kinesiske teknogigantar er i aukande grad synleg og etablerte på den europeiske marknaden. Er vi klare for alt det inneber?
Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Norway’s Options
What would the late political economist and intellectual Albert O. Hirschmann have said if asked to assess the developments in Europe – and its future – at a time when decision makers and voters feel that the quality of their community is decreasing, or fail to see the benefits of its achievements? Drawing on Hirschmann’s works, NUPI Director Ulf Sverdrup offers three intertwined strategies for European states’ approach to Europe in the time to come: “Exit”, “voice” and “loyalty”. Sverdrup reminds us that most would agree that being European is something more than being a EU citizen. According to him, there are good reasons to believe that non-members, like Norway, can contribute to developing Europe in the future. However, a common challenge for both outsiders and insiders is to recognize the multifaceted nature of Europe, and to encourage non-members not to disengage from Europe while, at the same time, encouraging the EU to relate to its European partners outside the EU.
Introduction: The EU and the Changing (Geo)Politics of Energy in Europe
This introductory chapter has three purposes. First, it presents the background for this volume originating in a research project on European integration funded by the Research Council of Norway (RCN). Second, it explains why EU energy policy in this context deserves closer scrutiny looking at energy relationships between the EU and external suppliers of energy and the EU and member states. Finally, this chapter gives an overview of the content of this book and explains rationales for the choice of cases presenting how the EU projects its power, how external suppliers Norway, Russia, Algeria and LNG providers have responded and how the member states Germany, Poland and the three Baltic countries interact with the EU when implementing their energy policies.
Europa gjennom den russiske TV-skjermen
Kva bilete av Europa blir viste på russisk TV? Kva forteljingar har russiske medium om Europa?
Noreg og Europa: Kva framtid vil du ha?
Viss du er fødd på nittitalet, kan du neppe hugse eit liv utan EØS-avtalen frå 1994. Dagens 25-åringar skal arve avtalen. Men kva ønskjer eigentleg denne generasjonen for Noregs framtid i Europa?