Forsker
Pernille Rieker
Kontaktinfo og filer
Sammendrag
Pernille Riekers forskningsinteresser er europeisk integrasjon (EU) og europeisk utenriks- og sikkerhetspolitikk, inkludert fransk og de nordiske lands utenriks- og sikkerhetspolitikk. I tillegg har hun arbeidet med dialog og konfliktforebygging mer generelt. Hun har en doktorgrad (dr.polit) fra 2004 (Universitetet i Oslo). På NUPI er Rieker del av Forskningsgruppen for sikkerhet og forsvar (SecDef). Hun er koordinator for NUPIs Senter for Europastudier (NSE) og medredaktør for tidsskriftet Internasjonal Politikk.
Publikasjoner:
Bøker: Franske tilstander: Forstå det moderne Frankrike? (Universitetsforlaget 2024); European Actorness in a Shifting Geopolitical Order. European Strategic Autonomy Through Differentiated Integration (Palgrave 2024); French Foreign Policy in a Changing World. Practising Grandeur (Palgrave 2017); External governance as security community building – the limits and potential of the European Neighbourhood Policy (Routledge 2016); Dialogue and Conflict resolution. Potential and limits (Routledge 2015) og Europeanization of National Security Identity. The EU and the changing security identities of the Nordic states (Routledge 2006).
Artikler: Making Sense of the European Side of the Transatlantic Security Relations in Africa (Politics & Governance, 2022); 'Not so unique after all? Urgency and Norms in EU foreign and security policy' (Journal of European Integration, 2021); 'Differentiated integration and Europe's Global Role: A Conceptual Framework' (European Foreign Affairs Review, Special Issue, 2021); 'Differentiated Defence Integration Under French Leadership' (European Foreign Affairs Review, Special Issue, 2021); 'Plugging the capability-expectations gap: towards effective, comprehensive and conflict-sensitive EU crisis response?' (European Security nr. 1, 2019); 'Spin-off av EØS? Norge og europeisk utenriks-, sikkerhets- og forsvarssamarbeid' (Internasjonal Politikk 77(4), 2019); 'EU-supported reforms in the EU neighbourhood as organized anarchies: the case of post-Maidan Ukraine' (Journal of European Integration nr. 4, 2018); 'Autonomy and Integration? Small-state responses to a changing European security landscape' (Global Affairs nr. 3, 2017); 'The EU, Russia and the potential for dialogue – Different readings of the crisis in Ukraine' (European Security nr. 3, 2016) og 'The EEA Grant. A source of Soft Power?' (Journal of European Integration nr. 4, 2015).
Mer informasjon om hennes øvrige arbeider finnes i hennes fullstendige CV eller på prosjektsidene.
Pågående forskning:
Pernille Rieker leder prosjektet RE-ENGAGE, som skal se på hvordan EU kan styrke sin utenrikspolitiske verktøykasse, inkludert utvidelses- og naboskapspolitikken - for å styrke unionens geopolitiske innflytelse og være bedre rustet til å fremme demokrati i sitt nabolag.
Innenfor rammen av Norge og EU mot 2030 ser Rieker nærmere på utviklingen av EU som sikkerhetspolitisk aktør og implikasjoner for Norge.
I ADHOCISM prosjektet ser hun nærmere på Frankrikes militære rolle i Mali.
Ekspertise
Utdanning
2004 Dr. polit, Institutt for statsvitenskap, Universitetet i Oslo. Avhandling: Europeanisation of Nordic security
1998 Can. polit, Institutt for statsvitenskap, University of Oslo. Avhandling: Fransk NATO-politikk i 1990-årene. Kontinuitet eller endring?
Arbeidserfaring
2017- Forsker I, NUPI
2011-2017 Seniorforsker, NUPI
2009-2011 Seniorrådgiver, NordForsk
1999-2009 Doktorgradsstipendat/seniorforsker/avdelingsleder, NUPI
Aktivitet
Filter
Tøm alle filtreDialogue and Conflict resolution - The potential and limits of dialogue as a tool for conflict resolution
Dialogue is typically hailed as a progressive force fostering mutual understanding and resolving conflicts. Can it really carry such a burden? Does dialogue really resolve conflicts? In this unique volume international experts critically assess the political role of dialogue, addressing its potential and limitations. Bringing fascinating insights to bear they examine the theoretical underpinnings and conceptual boundaries of dialogue as a tool for conflict resolution. Major recent crises such as the Russo-Georgian war in 2008, the conflict between Western powers and Gaddafi’s Libya, arguments over Iran’s nuclear programme, religious tensions in Egypt after the Arab Spring, the Afghan case, the Sudanese experience and the recent Russo-Ukraine conflict are all considered and the conflict resolution attempts discussed. Using these cases the contributors explore in depth the nature of the dialogue between the actors, the extent to which it worked and what determined its impact. Table of Contents 1 Introduction: Dialogue and conflict resolution Pernille Rieker 2 Diplomacy and Dialogue Ole Jacob Sending 3 The dysfunctions of non-party conflict diplomacy Henrik Thune and Frida Nome 4 Dialogue in a World of Emotional Politics Paul Saurette and Henrik Thune 5 What makes dialogue and diplomacy work or not? Russia – Georgia and Russia – Ukraine Jakub M. Godzimirski 6 Nuclear Diplomacy: the Case of Iran Sverre Lodgaard 7 Libya: The promise and pitfalls of diplomacy Målfrid Braut-Hegghammer and Pernille Rieker 8 Peace dialogue, the Afghan case 2001–2014 Michael Semple 9 The attempts of dialogue in Sudan John Ashworth 10 Dialogue as tool for addressing religious tensions: containing the violence, or true conflict resolution? George Fahmi 11 Conclusions Pernille Rieker and Henrik Thune
Linking National and European Governance: Lessons for Poland and Norway, PISM Strategic File nr.17(53)
(Co-authored/co-edited with Polish members of the project team Lidia Puka, Roderick Parkes,Agata Gostyńska, Pernille Rieker, Marta Stormowska)Influencing the EU’s governance poses both a challenge and an opportunity to mid-size countries like Poland and Norway. As an analytical approach, “experimentalist governance”—with its focus on the utility of learning in a multilevel system—should offer both countries clues about influencing the European regime. Yet, the relevance of the theory to policy areas of most interest to both countries— security, energy and migration—remains unclear. As part of the GoodGov project, this paper assesses the applicability of experimentalist learning to these three fields and highlights the need for both countries to strengthen horizontal cooperation with state and non-state actors if they are to exploit it.
Active Participation Despite Limited Influence: Explaining Norway’s Participation in EU’s Security Policy
The ENP as an instrument for building a security community: The case of Morocco
The European Neighbourhood Policy: An instrument for security community building
Explaining the EU's performance in NATO: EU-NATO relations and challenges facing the EU as a security actor (EUPERFORM)
Prosjektet EUPERFORM analyserer Den europeiske union som global aktør. Analysen er basert på studier av EUs rolle, betydning og påvirkningsevne i internasjonale organisasjoner der unionen er represent...
The French return to NATO: Reintegration in practice, not in principle