Publikasjoner
The Russian Far East and the Northern Sea route in evolving Sino-Russian strategic relations
Diplomatiminister Brende
Denne artikkelen diskuterer Børge Brendes virke som diplomatiminister.
Norsk utenrikspolitikk begynner i Europa: arven etter Brende i europapolitikken
Engasjementspolitikk på autopilot: Fredsbygging, fredsbevaring og fredsmegling under Børge Brende
Å hoppe etter Refleks: Brendes Veivalg
I dette bidraget vil jeg løfte stortingsmeldingen "Veivalg for utenriks- og sikkerhetspolitikken" frem i diskusjonen rundt Brendes arv, og i) se "Veivalg" i lys av Jonas Gahr Støres "Refleks", og ii) moderere kritikken om at det ikke ble foretatt noen veivalg i stortingsmeldingen. Jeg vil særlig trekke frem satsningen på sårbare stater, som både i meldingen og i statsbudsjettet for 2018 er viet stor plass.
Vår fiende Russland?
De siste fire årene har fiendebildet av Russland i mange land vokst seg svært sterkt, tidvis på unyansert grunnlag. Parallelt har regimet blitt vanskeligere å forsvare.
How to understand and deal with Russian strategic communication measures?
Russia’s use of communicative tools to promote the country’s strategic objectives in the aftermath of the 2014 crisis in Ukraine has posed a new strategic challenge to the Western policy-making community. NATO, the EU and national authorities have become increasingly aware of this new challenge, and have taken measures to reduce the negative impacts of Russian (dis)information campaigns.
Everyday sovereignty: International experts, brokers and local ownership in peacebuilding Liberia
The present article investigates how sovereignty is performed, enacted and constructed in an everyday setting. Based on fieldwork and interviews with international embedded experts about the elusive meaning of ‘local ownership’, we argue that while sovereignty may, indeed, be a model according to which the international community ‘constructs’ rogue or failed polities in ‘faraway’ places, this view overlooks that these places are still spaces in which contestations over spheres of authority take place every day, and thus also spaces in which sovereignty is constructed and reconstructed on a daily basis. Local ownership, then, becomes our starting point for tracing the processes of the everyday enactment of sovereignty. We make the case that sovereignty should not be reified, but instead be studied in its quotidian and dynamic production, involving the multiplicity of actors reflecting the active production of the state beyond its presumptive existence as a homogeneously organized, institutionalized and largely centralized bureaucracy.