Publikasjoner
Non-tariff measures, exporting,and productivity: evidence from microdata in food processing industry
This paper is written with financial support by Non-tari barriers, food safety and international food trade joint project of Norwegian Institute of international Affairs (NUPI), University of Life Sciences and Kyiv School of Economics (KSE) funded by the Research Council of Norway (Contract no. 216742/O10).
Transatlantic Governance in Food Trade: Dispute settlement and equivalence as trade-facilitating tools
Effect of NTM on Productivity of Firms in Food Processing
This paper is written with financial support by Non-tarif barriers, food safety and international food trade joint project of Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI), University of Life Sciences and Kyiv School of Economics (KSE) funded by the Research Council of Norway (Contract no. 216742/O10).
Uruguay's beef industry : an assessment of WTO disciplines on market access in agriculture / José Bervejillo
Uforståelig påstand
Mens det er viktig med faglig og politisk debatt om virkningene av en handelsavtale mellom EU og USA (TTIP), blir det for enkelt å avskrive de bidrag man ikke liker som «utdaterte».
Cyber Security Capacity Building in Developing Countries
Cyberspace is an intrinsic part of the development of any country. A strong cyber capacity is crucial for states to progress and develop in economic, political and social spheres. The need to integrate cyber capacity building and development policies has been documented by both the cyber community, academia and policy makers. The investment in securing cyberspace is crucial, as it affects the success rate of other policy initiatives as well. However, there is a clear need for a deeper dialogue with the development community and recipient countries in order to better understand how to implement cyber capacities in practice in order to achieve broader development goals. To stimulate the debate on cyber capacity building and its on social and ecoonomic development worldwide this brief puts forward challenges to implementation. The aim to is to set priorities and identify indicators of success and failure. To steer this process a better overview of initiatives and avoid duplication, it is necessary to set up the challenges that both the donors and recipients face. By doing this we move cyber capacity building one step closer to successful implementation.