Forsker
Stein Sundstøl Eriksen
Kontaktinfo og filer
Sammendrag
Ekspertise
Utdanning
2000 Dr. Polit., Statsvitenskap, Universitetet i Oslo: Close links and blurred boundaries
1992 Cand. Polit., Statsvitenskap, Universitetet i Oslo
Arbeidserfaring
2000- Forsker/avdelingsleder NUPI, Oslo
1994-2000 Forsker, NIBR, Oslo
1992-1994 Junior Professional Officer, FN, New Dehli
Aktivitet
Filter
Tøm alle filtreThe Possibility of State Formation: the Experience of Botswana in a Theoretical Perspective
'State failure' in theory and practice: the idea of the state and the contradictions of state formation
State Formation and the Politics of Regime Survival: Zimbabwe in Theoretical Perspective
The theory of failure and the failure of theory: ‘state failure’, the idea of the state and the practice of state building
The Congo war and the prospects of state formation : Rwanda and Uganda compared
This paper analyses the effect of the Congo war on state power in Rwanda and Uganda. Drawing on theories of European state formation, it asks whether the Congo war has led to a strengthening of the state in the two countries. It is argued that this has not been the case. Neither the Rwandan nor the Ugandan state has been strengthened as a result of the war. I argue that this must be explained by changes in the state system, which have altered the links between war and state formation. The «war makes states» connection presupposes a positive relationship between regime maintenance and state formation. In contemporary Africa, there is no link. On the one hand, state survival is guaranteed anyway, no matter how weak the state is. On the other hand, regime survival does not depend on mobilisation of resources through taxation, since resources are available from elsewhere (aid, crime, plunder, globalisation, warlord politics).