Dei første digitale våpena i verda: Stuxnet
NUPI har gleda av å ønskje den premierte Wired-reporteren Ms. Kim Zetter velkommen til NUPI for å snakke om digitale krigføringa og bruken av digitale våpen. Foredraget vil i hovudsak handle om det digitale Stuxnet-angrepet som i januar 2010 forårsaka fysisk øydelegging på eit av Irans atomanlegg, og som i ettertid har blitt omtalt som eit symbol på det 21. hundreårets våpen.
How does war become a legitimate undertaking? Re-engaging the post-structuralist foundation of securitization theory
Abstract How does war become a legitimate undertaking? This article challenges the interpretation of securitization as a narrow, linear and intentional event by re-engaging the post-structuralist roots of Copenhagen School securitization theory. To uncover the social process that makes war acceptable, the framework presented in this article is informed by securitization theory but foregrounds the web of meaning and representation between a myriad of actors in society to unearth the contents – and changes – in how war is articulated and carried out with public consent. This matters not only for the question of how war becomes a legitimate undertaking, but also for the very practices through which the war is fought: the emergency measures that are enabled in a discourse of existential threat. The article re-visits the Second Chechen War to illustrate how war is made logical and legitimate to leaders and their publics.
Korleis kan Europa møte energi-, migrasjons- og tryggingsutfordringar?
NUPI, Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM) og Institute of Political Studies ved Polish Academy of Science (ISP PAN) har gleda av å invitere til konferansen "Good Governance: how to address energy, migration and security challenges in Europe. Contribution from Poland and Norway" i Brussel 24. mai.
Rita Augestad Knudsen
Rita Augestad Knudsen er seniorforsker på NUPI i forskningsgruppen for sikkerhet og forsvar. Hun arbeider spesielt med kontraterror, spesielt fore...
Konflikt i cyberspace
Den raske digitaliseringen gjør oss stadig mer avhengige av et fungerende og stabilt cyberspace.
Holding the borders, holding the centre: the EU and the refugee crisis
What has come to be called the ‘refugee crisis’ is the latest in a series of crises bedevilling the European Union – the four-fold monetary,budgetary, economic and financial ‘Euro-crisis’; a geopolitical security challenge posed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,the war in Syria and incursions into NATO airspace, and a looming Brexit, combined with the possible fragmentation of old EU member states like the United Kingdom and Spain. The ‘refugee crisis’ is the most serious of all. It encapsulates the EU’s failings and failures that other crises laid bare: the lack of long-term prevision and strategy, an overburdened decision-making system, and an outmoded conception of sovereignty. It goes to the very heart of the EU, for three reasons: Firstly, the cleavages it creates between member states add to those that have been dividing the EU since the early days of the Euro-crisis; secondly, the massive displacement of populations gives rise to complex problems, sparking controversies that weaken the social and political fabric of individual member states and feed into populism and enophobia; and, thirdly, the German Chancellor, who has played a crucial role in alleviating, if not solving, other crises, is facing domestic and European rebellions for her handling of the refugee issue. Will the agreement that the EU and Turkey concluded on 18 March 2016 manage to limit the influx of refugees, patch up differences, and re-establish Angela Merkel’s authority in Germany and in the Union?
How to govern cyber security? The limits of the multi-stakeholder approach and the need to rethink public-private cooperation