Options for Arctic governance in difficult weather
The Arctic continues to be transformed and impacted by global forces, from declining sea ice on the Arctic Ocean, through new summers of devastati...
Gir inntrykk av «business as usual» i Arktis
Changing or frozen narratives? The Arctic in Russian media and expert commentary, 2021–2022
Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022 has brought Russia–West relations to its lowest point since the Cold War. Relations in the Arctic region are not excepted, evidenced not least by the other seven member states’ pausing their participation in Russia’s Arctic Council chairmanship (which concluded in May 2023). To the extent that “Arctic exceptionalism” – the notion that the Arctic has been characterised by a cooperative mode between Russia and the West which has remained relatively untouched by increasing tensions elsewhere – was ever an appropriate description, Western analysts have now declared it firmly dead. How does this situation look from within Russia? This research paper investigates how the Russian state media and the foreign policy expert community have portrayed the Arctic in 2021 and 2022. How much change has been seen since the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine? By surveying “the story about the Arctic” as presented by mainstream narrators and experts, we gain insights into, among other things, how changes in Arctic cooperation, sanctions, the role of China in the Arctic, and the question of climate change are conveyed to Russian audiences. The paper proceeds as follows. We start by briefly explaining the methods and data used. We then present a portrayal of the Arctic in Russia’s government’s newspaper Rossiiskaya gazeta, followed by the role of the Arctic in analyses published by the Russian International Affairs Council and the journal Russia in Global Affairs. Lastly, we conclude by discussing a general continuity in the way the Arctic is framed in the material, and foreground three core themes: climate change, security, and cooperation.
Klimaendringer i Arktis: Sikkerhetsimplikasjoner og konsekvenser for militære operasjoner – et MCDC-prosjekt (CLIMARCSEC)
Klimaendringene åpner opp Arktis for konkurranse i et tempo som utfordrer eksisterende styringsstrukturer og nasjonale militære kapasiteter. Dette skal CLIMARCSEC se nærmere på....
Climate Change and Arctic Security, Multi-Actor, Diverse and Distributed Assets and Modalities
Klima- og miljøendringer skaper svært varierende operative forhold både for allierte og motstandere. Mens teknologi ofte blir fremhevet som avgjørende for å oppnå strategiske fordeler, er dette ikke nødvendigvis tilfellet i Arktis. Her er det kunnskap som gir strategisk fortrinn, da den som har mest kunnskap, besitter flere strategiske alternativer og kan anvende denne kunnskapen for å oppnå strategisk dominans uten behov for åpen konflikt. For å raskt tilegne oss presis kunnskap samtidig som vi begrenser motstandernes kunnskap, er det nødvendig å forstå deres mønstre for innhenting av informasjon og forståelse. Manglende innsikt i deres handlemønster fører til at vi ikke kan oppdage eller håndtere fiendtlige aktiviteter effektivt. Fremtidig planlegging forsøker å adressere dette problemet, men den mangler presisjon og grundighet for å produsere konkrete resultater som kan anvendes taktisk. Ved å innføre en rammeverk som tar hensyn til flere aktører, distribuerte ressurser og moduser, kan denne mangelen overvinnes.
Considering ecological security from the perspective of Arctic ecosystemic politics
This brief essay is part of a book forum on Matt McDonald's book (2021) presenting the idea of ecological security. In the essay, I reflect on progress and prospects for Arctic cooperation and governance in order to consider the promise and limitations of McDonald’s ecological security framework. The Arctic is an instructive example for such an exploration. The longstanding post-Cold War cooperation in the Arctic is strongly rooted in an appreciation of the interconnected nature of the Arctic ecosystem, even as the governance mechanisms remain far from what would qualify as an ecological security approach in McDonald’s sense. Nonetheless, I suggest that especially two aspects are instructive from the Arctic example. The first relates to how ecological security would potentially interface with an already quite full landscape of governance practices rooted in ecosystems, and associated power political genealogies and effects. The second point is a reflection on unfolding events, seeking to explore how continued inputs from other forms of security governance could impact on emerging or partial attempts to govern with an ecological security perspective. Here, the status of Arctic cooperative governance after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is an illustrative example to consider. Both points can be read as impediments limiting the applicability of the ecological security framework. However, as McDonald argued, impediments are not the same as absolute limits (2021, 192) and potential obstacles are explored here in the spirit of advancing possibilities for ecological security.
Russlandskonferansen 2023: Russland og Vesten – en ny virkelighet
Bli med når vi 14. november sparker i gang Russlandskonferansen 2023!
Skal forske på venner i Arktis
Norge og Polen som aktører i et sikkerhetslandskap i endring (NORPOLFACTOR)
Målet med dette prosjektet er å utvikle økt kunnskap om sikkerhetsrelaterte utfordringer, risikoer og trusler Polen og Norge står overfor i sitt strategiske miljø i kjølvannet av den russiske invasjon...