Researcher
Sverre Lodgaard
Contactinfo and files
Summary
Sverre Lodgaard’s expert fields are geopolitics, the Middle East, Iranian foreign policy, nuclear arms control and disarmament, the nuclear programmes of Iran and North Korea.
Lodgaard was the director of NUPI from 1997 to 2007.
Expertise
Education
1971 Magister degree in political science, University of Oslo. Thesis: Interaction Trends and Integration Loads in the East-West System
Work Experience
2007- Senior Research Fellow, NUPI
1997-2007 Director, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Oslo
1992-1996 Director, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), United Nations Office at Geneva
1987-1992 Director, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO)
1980-1986 Research Fellow, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)
Aktivitet
Filter
Clear all filtersHow to deal with North Korea?
The threats posed by North Korea have never been greater, Sverre Lodgaard writes in new policy brief.
How to Deal with North Korea: Lessons from the Iran Agreement
The current and oft repeated pattern of responses to North Korean nuclear and missile provocations has failed to produce results. With the stakes becoming increasingly high it is time that a new approach is explored. The success to date of the deal to cap Iran’s nuclear program offers clues to a different approach with North Korea. North Korea’s position now is stronger than ever before it has more bargaining chips. Conversely the threats posed by North Korea have never been greater. A negotiated settlement is the only acceptable outcome. The key will be to have a broad enough agenda for negotiations to ensure all parties see benefit: addressing the nuclear and missile issues, economic issues (removal of sanctions) and security issues (a Korean peace treaty to replace the armistice). The alternatives to negotiations are war or another nuclear weapon state with a de facto nuclear deterrent capability. Neither prospect will make any nation in the region more secure.
External powers and the Arab Spring
Governance in the Middle East is a sad story, and the fate of the Arab Spring added to the misery. After the initial euphoria, much got worse. Except in Tunisia, where Islamic and secular political groups compete for power in a democratic political system. This book examines the role of external powers during the Arab Spring in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia. How did the United States and the European Union react? What did Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel and Iran – regional states not directly affected by the revolutionary uprisings – do? All of them acted on the basis of their own values and interests, with scant regard for the preferences of the local actors. Some tried to promote democratic practice and human rights, but were hampered by their own inefficiencies and conflicting interests. In the end, none of them mattered very much: they were little more than bystanders. In this book, leading international experts in their respective fields offer perspectives and analyses that, hopefully, will be of use in shaping more effective support for better governance at critical junctures in the future. The book is a joint project of the Toda Institute for Global Policy and Research in Hawai and the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) in Oslo.
Book launch: External Powers and the Arab Spring
What was the role of external powers during the Arab Spring?
The crises in the Middle East, Pakistan and Islam
How does the debate on Islam affect politics in Pakistan?
Israeli security after the nuclear deal with Iran
Israeli security after the nuclear deal with Iran, written by Efraim Halevy, is number 12 in NUPI’s series about regional dimensions of the nuclear diplomacy with Iran.