Scientific article
Published:
How Ad Hoc Coalitions Deinstitutionalize International Institutions
Written by
John Karlsrud
Research Professor, Head of the Research group on Peace, Conflict and Development
Malte Brosig
Department of International Relations, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
Ed.
Summary:
As ad hoc coalitions (AHCs) proliferate, particularly on the African continent, two questions crystallize. First, what consequences do they bring about for the existing institutional security landscape? And second, how can the trend of AHCs operating alongside instead of inside regional organizations be captured and explored conceptually? To answer these questions, we closely examine the Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF) fighting Boko Haram and its changing relationship to the African Union (AU). Through the case study and a review of policy and academic literatures, the article launches the concept of deinstitutionalization and how it can be characterized. We identify three features of deinstitutionalization – AHCs can bypass standard procedures for decision-making processes; whittle down established institutional scripts, and shift resource allocations. We detail how the AHCs contribute to changing practices of financing international peace and security operations, with an examination of EU and UN policies and practices. In sum, the paper unwraps the processes of deinstitutionalization and identifies three forms of rationales for this process – lack of problem-solving capacity, limited adaptability and path dependency.
- Published year: 2024
- Full version: Read here
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae009
- Publisher: Oxford University Press
- Language: English
- Journal: International Affairs
Written by
John Karlsrud
Research Professor, Head of the Research group on Peace, Conflict and Development
Malte Brosig
Department of International Relations, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa